EdinPhoto Web Site
Picture Sizes |
Please click on a link below to read:
1.
The question that I asked about your preference for
picture sizes on the EdinPhoto site.
2.
The replies I received - not a lot, but they
were all consistent.
3.
My conclusions
This page ends
with a brief note on the responses to two earlier
questions that I asked about the EdinPhoto web site in December 2013 and the
responses that I received.
Peter Stubbs, Edinburgh: January 11, 2014 |
Question |
"Are you happy with the size of pictures
that
I've been adding to the
EdinPhoto web site ?"
If you'd like to comment,
please email me. Thank you.
|
Background
I'm asking this question because I'm aware that people
are now viewing the EdinPhoto web site on a wide variety of hardware.
If the sizes of pictures that Im currently adding to
the web site suit your needs I'd like to hear. If not, it would be good to
hear, so that I can decide whether or not I should do anything differently. |
Picture sizes
1. The normal size of picture that I add to the web
site is 640 pixels on its longest side.
2. Often, that is the only picture that I add to
the site, but where I feel that the picture might: have
more impact if larger, or
where I feel that more detail
might be seen on a larger picture, I'll sometimes also add a larger copy to the
web site, usually either 1024 or 1400 pixels for the longest side.
3. Where I do add larger images to the web site,
I always add the smaller (640 pixel) size image to the site as well in the
belief that the smaller size might be the only size that will be appropriate for
some people. The first link that I provide points to the smaller size
photo, leaving the viewer to click on a 'view
larger photo' link if they wish to.
4. I've given, below, some examples of the three
sizes that I've mentioned above. I hope these will be helpful to you:
- Photos 1 + 2 are 640 pixels for the longest
side.
- Photos 3 + 4 are 1024 pixels for the longest
side.
- Photos 5 + 6 are 1400 pixels for the longest
side.
5. I look forward to hearing from you if you have
any comments that you'd like to
email to me.
Peter Stubbs, Edinburgh:
January 1, 2014 |
Replies
Thank you to those who have replied to this question.
Here are the replies that I've received so far. |
Photo
1.
640 pixels wide
©
Please contact
peter.stubbs@edinphoto.org.uk
Photo taken
November 25, 2013
Photo
2.
640 pixels wide +high
©
Please contact
peter.stubbs@edinphoto.org.uk
Photo taken
December 9, 2013
Photo
3.
1024 pixels wide
©
Please contact
peter.stubbs@edinphoto.org.uk
Photo taken
November 25, 2013
Photo
4.
1024 pixels wide + high
©
Please contact
peter.stubbs@edinphoto.org.uk
Photo taken
December 9, 2013
Photo
5.
1400 pixels wide
©
Please contact
peter.stubbs@edinphoto.org.uk
Photo taken
November 25, 2013
Photo
6.
1400 pixels wide + high
©
Please contact
peter.stubbs@edinphoto.org.uk
Photo taken
December 9, 2013
Replies
received to the question:
"Are you happy with the size of pictures
that
I've been adding to the
EdinPhoto web site?"
Not a lot of
people replied. I hope this indicates that most people are not
experiencing any problems with the resolution of the images that I've been
showing on the EdinPhoto web site.
The replies are below. Those who did reply all
expressed enthusiasm for large images. |
1. |
Robert Laird
Burdiehouse, Edinburgh
|
"Hi Peter,
When I look at the 1400
pixel example of a picture, it is amazing.
Unless it screws things up I would say the higher
resolution would get my vote."
|
2. |
Simon Capaldi
Sheriffhall, Midlothian,
Scotland |
"Peter:
I prefer the 1024
and 1400 pixels." |
3. |
Liz Miller
Jersey, Channel Islands |
"Hi Peter:
I find the photos are fine for me, though I do like to
look at the larger
ones when they are available
I’m usually looking at them on a Samsung notepad, not a
laptop or full PC. |
4. |
Bob Henderson
Burdiehouse, Edinburgh |
"Hi Peter:
I use a desk top with a 19 inch monitor and I find
the pictures just right for me, both sizes
that is.
I feel that you have it just right in your choices
of when to use the larger size as I find that in the main these are the ones I
personally would like to see in greater detail. e.g. old shop windows, groups of
people etc." |
5. |
Dave McDougall
Edinburgh |
"Dear Peter:
Larger photographs? Yes please!
Personally, I'd like
much larger photographs.
I believe that PCs generally now are usually running in
quite high resolutions (even my laptop is running at 1600x900) and this makes
low resolution (eg 640) photographs appear very small on the computer screen.
If it is possible therefore to post photos at higher
resolutions (without loss of quality) then I'd like them to be as high as
possible.
An interesting site that I browse for historical
photographs is
http://www.shorpy.com/ I appreciate that possibly not all photographs can be
reproduced to the quality/size of photos shown there"
|
Dave:
Thanks for
your comments above and for the link to the
Shorpy
web site.
Certainly,
left-clicking on one of the images on the
Shorpy
site to enlarge it shows how much more impact a large,
high resolution image can have, compared to a small one.
Peter Stubbs, Edinburgh: January 5, 2013 |
6. |
Allan Dodds
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, England |
"Hi Peter:
I prefer the 1,400
pixel size" |
Any More Replies?
Please
email me (peter.stubbs@edinphoto.org.uk) if you have any views that
you'd like to pass on to me. Thank you.
Peter Stubbs, Edinburgh: January 2, 2013 |
Conclusions
reached
after reading your replies to the question:
"Are you
happy with the size of pictures ... ?"
The replies are
below. Those who did reply all expressed enthusiasm for large images. |
1. |
The small number of replies received, and the absence of any criticism, suggests
to me that viewers are NOT having any major problems with the pictures as they
are currently displayed on the web site.
So, I'll not make any major changes to the resolution of the pictures that I
display. The 'normal' resolution that I'll continue to display will be
640
pixels for the longest side. |
2. |
I
was interested to read some people's enthusiasm for larger images, and I can
understand this when I look at large images on some other sites such as the
Shorpy
site mentioned by Dave McDougall in his reply above.
So, especially where I feel that more information might be obtained from a
larger image (e.g. some of the maps) or where a larger image might have
significantly more impact, I'll display the image at
1400
pixels, or in some cases at 1920
pixels, for the longest size. |
Note |
Since I created the EdinPhoto web site, over ten years ago, there have been some
significant changers in the screens that are used to view web sites. The two
trends below are pulling in different directions:
(a) More use is now being made of mobile phones and tablets. These,
especially the phones, are likely to have screens with fairly low resolutions.
(a) For those who continue to use Desktop and Laptop PC, Apple Macs, etc,
the resolution of screens has been increasing. Now, almost 10% of
screens in use have a display size of either 1920x1080 or 1920x11200 pixels.
Hence my choice of 1920
pixels above fr the largest size that I've chosen above. |
Peter Stubbs, Edinburgh: January 11, 2014 |
Earlier Questions
and
Replies |
Website
and Guestbook
Thank you to all who replied to the two questions that I
asked about the EdinPhoto web site in December 2013.
Your answers on both questions have been helpful. I've now taken them into
account as I go forward with the web site.
There was close agreement between all your answers on both questions.
Please see below.
Q.1. |
Should I
re-design the web site. |
'No' |
Q.2. |
Can we
stop adding new entries
to the guestbook? |
'Yes' |
I've now taken account of your replies.
|
|