Cabinet Portrait
Railway Workers
and
Engine |
Where and When?
Answer: Tuthill Quarry, County Durham,
England
Probably between 1888 and 1895
See 'Reply 7' below
©
Reproduced with acknowledgement
to Phil Wild: December 28, 2011
Railway Workers and Engine |
Phil Wild
wrote:
|
Questions
"This photo purports to be one of my wife's
ancestors. I'm trying to pin down the location and date of the photo
if I can. I'm guessing that the photo might have been taken around
1890.
Blown up, the plate on the engine reads
Manning Wardle & Co Engine No. 498 Leeds 1874
|
Back of the Cabinet Print
I wonder if the stuff on the back or the
cabinet photo might be of significance.
©
Phil Wild, Saddleworth, Greater Manchester, England:: December 28, 2011 |
Reply to Phil?
If you can help to answer the
questions that Phil asks above, please email me then I'll pass on your
message to him. Thank you.
Peter Stubbs,
Edinburgh: December 31, 2011 |
Reply
1.
Phil Wild
Saddleworth, Greater Manchester,
England |
Location?
Thank you to
Phil Wild for writing again. Phil has now told me where he hopes to
find that the photo was taken, but I'll not add the name of the place to
the web site yet. Instead, I'll wait and see if I get any replies.
Acknowledgement: Phil Wild, Saddleworth, Greater Manchester,
England: December 31, 2011
|
Reply
2.
David Bain
Rotherham, South Yorkshire, England |
Thank you to
David Bain who wrote:
|
0-4-0ST Manning Wardle Shunters
"I've been digging and have found a photo of
two near-identical locos on the Hull & Barnsley Railway on this page of
the LNER Railway
Encyclopaedia web site. Neither carried the fleet number 2,
though.
It's a strange coincidence given that the
writing on the back of the photograph refers to the Earl of Yarborough,
whose estate was in the Hull & Barnsley area.
Just to confuse things, of course, Manning
Wardle made standard designs. Many went into industrial use and
there are even preserved examples in Australia and New Zealand."
David Bain, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, England:
December 31, 2011 |
Reply
3.
David King
Trinity, Edinburgh |
Thank you to
David King who wrote:
|
Manning Wardle
"An interesting question! For a start my
guess is that this is not a local picture to Edinburgh. Manning
Wardle were in Leeds, as stated, and as far as I know very few of their
locomotives were used in Scotland. Their production was largely
industrial tank engines, although the main line railways bought small
numbers from time to time. The adverts on the back of the photo are
probably a good clue, suggesting that the photo was taken in Hull or
nearby.
Manning Wardle were in existence from 1858 to
1927 during which time they built just over 2,000 locomotives. So number
498 is one of the earlier ones – at a guess maybe built in the 1870s. *
It is clearly not brand new in the photograph."
* The engine plate mentioned by Phil Wild
above appears to be dated 1874
Location
"What the location is, I have no idea –
presumably a works or colliery, as the track and ‘ballasting’ are not in a
good state. The loco presumably had to deal with non-main line type
vehicles, such as small hopper wagons or something similar, as in addition
to short buffers in the usual position there are also blocks extending
below the buffer beams to cope with small vehicles, together with a plate
extending below the rear buffer beam.
It probably did not venture far afield given
its very small coal capacity in the side bunkers and from its condition
would probably not have been allowed on a main line railway.
There is information online about Manning
Wardle but unfortunately I can’t find a list of the locos they built and
who bought them."
David King, Trinity, Edinburgh: December 31, 2011 |
Reply
4.
Phil Wild
Saddleworth, Greater Manchester,
England |
I found the
comments in David King's 'Location' paragraph above and his reference to
the loco having possibly been used on a colliery to be interesting.
Earlier this
evening, Phil Wild wrote:
|
Location and Date
"I'm hoping the engine proves to have been in
service somewhere near Shotton Colliery in the North East of England
between, say, 1888 and 1895."
David King, Trinity, Edinburgh: December 31, 2011 |
Date
The style of
card that the photo is mounted on looks typical of the style that was in
use (invariably for studio portraits) in the 1880s and 1890s. These
were very popular in that period but soon went out of fashion around 1900.
Peter Stubbs, Edinburgh: December 31, 2011 |
Reply
5.
Euan Cameron
New York, New York, USA |
Thank you to
Euan Cameron who wrote: |
Manning Wardles
"Somebody else raised a question on the
Internet about this engine, MW498.
There is an interesting
Industrial Railway
Society web page on Manning
Wardles locos. The loco in the header on this page is very similar
to that in your photo, except that MW498 has Naylor safety valves, which
were quite rare (and a bad idea generally, hence their rarity)."
Euan Cameron, New York, New York, USA: January 1,
2012 |
Reply
6.
David Bain
Rotherham, South Yorkshire, England |
Thank you to
David Bain for writing again.
David added:
|
Loco MW498
"Somebody
else has asked a question about this loco on this
Brunell Steam Model Engineering web forum, but
to date no information has been provided."
David Bain, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, England:
January 1, 2012 |
This may be the
question that Euan Cameron also found on the Internet.
The question
was asked in August 2010 and until today had received only one reply
(which seems not to be relevant) so I signed up to to the forum today and
posted a comment to see if that might provoke any further response.
Peter Stubbs, Edinburgh: January 1, 2012 |
Reply
7.
Brian Lacey
East Grinstead, West Sussex, England
|
Thank you to
Brian Lacey who wrote:
|
Location
©
Tuthill or Haverton Hill?
"MW 498 was one of Manning Wardle's
standard H class
0-4-0ST locos.
- It was
supplied new to J Witham & Son, Perseverance
Ironworks Ltd, named 'Perseverance'.
- It was later
sold to the Tuthill Limestone Co, Tuthill Limestone
Quarry.
- It was then sold to
Casebourne & Co, Haverton Hill.
- Its final recorded owner was the North
Beechburn Coal Co Ltd, who named it 'Arrow'.
Corrections
Information from F W Mabbott -
Manning Wardle & Co Ltd Locomotive Works List (author? 1982).
Beechburn is incorrect in Mabbott and
should actually be Bitchburn, see 'The Industrial Railways and
Locomotives of County Durham' - page 253 - Industrial Railway Society 2006
which records the loco as being sold or scrapped after 2/1895.
On page 292 of the same book there is
a record of the locomotive's use by Tuthill Quarry, near Haswell.
|
I suggest the photo may have been taken either
at Tuthill or Haverton Hill."
Brian Lacey, East Grinstead, West Sussex, England: October 6+8, 2012 |
Location
(a) Tuthill Quarry (mentioned by Brian Lacey above) was in County
Durham, about 7 miles east of the city of Durham, North East England.
(b) Haverton Hill (also mentioned by Brian Lacey above) is
in County Durham, in the borough of Stockton on Tees, about 20 miles SE of
the city of Durham.
(c) Phil Wild who provided the photo above wrote in
Recollections 4 above::
"I'm hoping that the engine proves to have
been in service somewhere near Shotton Colliery in the North East of
England between say 1888 and 1895"
Phil Wild, Saddleworth, Greater Manchester, England:
December 28, 2011 |
Result
©
Shotton Colliery was about 1 mile to the south of Tuthill Quarry.
So it appears that Brian Lacey (above) has found the link that Phil Wild
was hoping would be found. This photo would have been taken at
Tuthill Quarry, probably between 1888 and 1895.
Peter Stubbs, Edinburgh: October 10, 2012 |
Reply
8.
Phil Wild
Saddleworth, Greater Manchester,
England |
Phil Wild
replied:
|
Location
"That is amazing. The power of the
internet, eh?
It would have been Tuthill, as that is where
the ancestor was killed in a railway accident in 1895."
Acknowledgement: Phil Wild, Saddleworth, Greater Manchester,
England: August 10, 2012
|
|